Louis E. Lataif  lays out some details of  the higher education bubble in 
Forbes:
Higher education in America, historically the envy of the world, is  rapidly growing out of reach. For the past quarter-century, the cost of  higher education has grown 440%, according to the National Center for  Public Policy and Education, nearly four times the rate of inflation and  double the rate of health care cost increases. The cost increases have  occurred at both public and private colleges.
Like many situations  too good to be true--like the dot-com boom, the Enron bubble, the  housing boom or the health care cost explosion--the ever-increasing cost  of university education is not sustainable.
Just 10 years ago the cost of a four-year public college education  amounted to 18% of the annual income of middle-income families. Ten  years later, it amounted to 25% of that family's average annual income.  The cost of attending a private university is about double the cost of  public universities. Think of higher education as the proverbial frog in  boiling water. It feels very warm and comfy but soon will be cooked.
Can blended/hybrid learning increase productivity?
Yet colleges and universities can improve their life expectancy--and  their relevance--if they focus on becoming more productive.  There are  many innovative ways that can be accomplished.  It will involve taking  advantage of disruptive technologies.   Technology-assisted pedagogy can  be enormously effective.
It's difficult in today's universities to talk about "productivity"  or "efficiency" the way business does.  Faculty members associate that  idea with larger classes, a higher teaching load or lower quality.  And  given the lifetime tenure system and the co-governance structure of most  universities, orderly change will not happen without the cooperation of  the faculty.
But everyone, particularly faculty scholars, favors high-quality  learning.   Universities need to embrace the concept of "deeper  learning"--increasing the value of a college education by delivering  more education, and doing so in ways that increase retention.  In other  words, learn more per dollar spent, and retain what is learned longer.
Deeper learning means getting 150% or 200% of the knowledge formerly delivered in a given course.  The Chronicle of Higher Education  reported: "Several studies have shown that students learn a full  semester's worth of material in half the time when online coursework is  added."
There is so much classroom time that can be off-loaded to technology  tools for self-paced learning in asynchronous time. And then the time  spent in the classroom on the same subjects can be much richer with  robust discussion and debate about the strengths and limitations of  those tools and techniques.
Hybrid learning in elementary school:  
The combination of a strong teacher with Khan Academy - too good to be true? 
I like Walter Russell Mead's proposal re: college costs.
ReplyDeleteI wish I was fluent enough in economics to say what I mean here....
ReplyDeleteI don't think the issue with college spending is 'efficiency' per se. Of course college spending is inefficient, but that's a feature, not a bug.
If blended learning saved money, that money would be plowed into more construction programs, expansions to China, etc., etc., etc.
This is the same issue as e-textbooks. I don't think widespread adoption of e-textbooks would reduce costs to students and parents at all. The paper and ink aren't the reason textbooks cost hundreds of dollars.
Textbooks cost hundreds of dollars because textbooks have a captive market that is relatively 'insensitive to price' (I think that's the term.
Lately I've been seeing more about Walter Russell Mead's proposal, to let people become credentialed while bypassing the higher education establishment. Here a post from Instapundit:
ReplyDeleteHere’s the problem: Currently, you can acquire very expensive credentials without much of an education, or you can acquire a relatively inexpensive education without credentials.
At some point in the not-too-distant future, that dichotomy is going to be resolved. And I know which side of that bet I’m putting my money on.
http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/118658/